2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// This represents a filtering query. This can be done
|
|
|
|
// in parallel map/reduce style, or directly on a single
|
|
|
|
// entry to assert it matches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use super::entry::Entry;
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
use std::cmp::{Ordering, PartialOrd};
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Perhaps make these json serialisable. Certainly would make parsing
|
|
|
|
// simpler ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
pub enum Filter {
|
|
|
|
// This is attr - value
|
|
|
|
Eq(String, String),
|
|
|
|
Sub(String, String),
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
Pres(String),
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
Or(Vec<Filter>),
|
|
|
|
And(Vec<Filter>),
|
|
|
|
Not(Vec<Filter>),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl Filter {
|
2018-11-14 02:54:59 +01:00
|
|
|
// Does this need mut self? Aren't we returning
|
|
|
|
// a new copied filter?
|
|
|
|
fn optimise(&self) -> Self {
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// Apply optimisations to the filter
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
// An easy way would be imple partialOrd
|
|
|
|
// then do sort on the or/and/not
|
|
|
|
// as the general conditions we want
|
|
|
|
// to optimise on are in those ...
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The other big one is folding redundant
|
|
|
|
// terms down.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If an or/not/and condition has no items, remove it
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// If its the root item?
|
2018-11-14 02:54:59 +01:00
|
|
|
self.clone()
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This is probably not safe, so it's for internal test cases
|
|
|
|
// only because I'm familiar with the syntax ... you have been warned.
|
2018-11-11 22:59:09 +01:00
|
|
|
fn from_ldap_string(_ldap_string: String) -> Result<Self, ()> {
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// For now return an empty filters
|
|
|
|
Ok(Filter::And(Vec::new()))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// What other parse types do we need?
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: This check should be in ENTRY not here, because it's up to others
|
|
|
|
// to interpret filter meaning and application!!!
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// Assert if this filter matches the entry (no index)
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
pub fn entry_match_no_index(&self, e: &Entry) -> bool {
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
// Go through the filter components and check them in the entry.
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// This is recursive!!!!
|
|
|
|
match self {
|
2018-11-07 08:27:11 +01:00
|
|
|
Filter::Eq(_, _) => false,
|
|
|
|
Filter::Sub(_, _) => false,
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
Filter::Pres(attr) => {
|
|
|
|
// Given attr, is is present in the entry?
|
2018-11-14 02:54:59 +01:00
|
|
|
e.attribute_pres(attr.as_str())
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-07 08:27:11 +01:00
|
|
|
Filter::Or(_) => false,
|
|
|
|
Filter::And(_) => false,
|
|
|
|
Filter::Not(_) => false,
|
2018-11-07 07:54:02 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
impl Clone for Filter {
|
|
|
|
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
// I think we only need to match self then new + clone?
|
|
|
|
match self {
|
|
|
|
Filter::Eq(a, v) => Filter::Eq(a.clone(), v.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Sub(a, v) => Filter::Sub(a.clone(), v.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Pres(a) => Filter::Pres(a.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Or(l) => Filter::Or(l.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Filter::And(l) => Filter::And(l.clone()),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Not(l) => Filter::Not(l.clone()),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl PartialEq for Filter {
|
|
|
|
fn eq(&self, rhs: &Filter) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
match (self, rhs) {
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Eq(a1, v1), Filter::Eq(a2, v2)) => a1 == a2 && v1 == v2,
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Sub(a1, v1), Filter::Sub(a2, v2)) => a1 == a2 && v1 == v2,
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Pres(a1), Filter::Pres(a2)) => a1 == a2,
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Or(l1), Filter::Or(l2)) => l1 == l2,
|
|
|
|
(Filter::And(l1), Filter::And(l2)) => l1 == l2,
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Not(l1), Filter::Not(l2)) => l1 == l2,
|
|
|
|
(_, _) => false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// remember, this isn't ordering by alphanumeric, this is ordering of
|
|
|
|
// optimisation preference!
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
impl PartialOrd for Filter {
|
|
|
|
fn partial_cmp(&self, rhs: &Filter) -> Option<Ordering> {
|
|
|
|
match (self, rhs) {
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Eq(a1, _), Filter::Eq(a2, _)) => {
|
|
|
|
// Order attr name, then value
|
|
|
|
// Later me may add rules to put certain attrs ahead due
|
|
|
|
// to optimisation rules
|
|
|
|
a1.partial_cmp(a2)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Sub(a1, _), Filter::Sub(a2, _)) => a1.partial_cmp(a2),
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Pres(a1), Filter::Pres(a2)) => a1.partial_cmp(a2),
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Eq(_, _), _) => {
|
|
|
|
// Always higher prefer Eq over all else, as these will have
|
|
|
|
// the best indexes and return smallest candidates.
|
|
|
|
Some(Ordering::Less)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(_, Filter::Eq(_, _)) => Some(Ordering::Greater),
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Pres(_), _) => Some(Ordering::Less),
|
|
|
|
(_, Filter::Pres(_)) => Some(Ordering::Greater),
|
|
|
|
(Filter::Sub(_, _), _) => Some(Ordering::Greater),
|
|
|
|
(_, Filter::Sub(_, _)) => Some(Ordering::Less),
|
|
|
|
(_, _) => Some(Ordering::Equal),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
|
|
use super::Filter;
|
|
|
|
use serde_json;
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
use std::cmp::{Ordering, PartialOrd};
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_filter_simple() {
|
|
|
|
let filt = Filter::Eq(String::from("class"), String::from("user"));
|
|
|
|
let j = serde_json::to_string_pretty(&filt);
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", j.unwrap());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let complex_filt = Filter::And(vec![
|
|
|
|
Filter::Or(vec![
|
|
|
|
Filter::Eq(String::from("userid"), String::from("test_a")),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Eq(String::from("userid"), String::from("test_b")),
|
|
|
|
]),
|
|
|
|
Filter::Eq(String::from("class"), String::from("user")),
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
let y = serde_json::to_string_pretty(&complex_filt);
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", y.unwrap());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_filter_optimise() {
|
|
|
|
// Given sets of "optimisable" filters, optimise them.
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-11 01:39:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_filter_eq() {
|
|
|
|
let f_t1a = Filter::Pres(String::from("userid"));
|
|
|
|
let f_t1b = Filter::Pres(String::from("userid"));
|
|
|
|
let f_t1c = Filter::Pres(String::from("zzzz"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a == f_t1b, true);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a == f_t1c, false);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1b == f_t1c, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let f_t2a = Filter::And(vec![f_t1a]);
|
|
|
|
let f_t2b = Filter::And(vec![f_t1b]);
|
|
|
|
let f_t2c = Filter::And(vec![f_t1c]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2a == f_t2b, true);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2a == f_t2c, false);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2b == f_t2c, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2c == Filter::Pres(String::from("test")), false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_filter_ord() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that we uphold the rules of partialOrd
|
|
|
|
// Basic equality
|
|
|
|
// Test the two major paths here (str vs list)
|
|
|
|
let f_t1a = Filter::Pres(String::from("userid"));
|
|
|
|
let f_t1b = Filter::Pres(String::from("userid"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a.partial_cmp(&f_t1b), Some(Ordering::Equal));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1b.partial_cmp(&f_t1a), Some(Ordering::Equal));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let f_t2a = Filter::And(vec![]);
|
|
|
|
let f_t2b = Filter::And(vec![]);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2a.partial_cmp(&f_t2b), Some(Ordering::Equal));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2b.partial_cmp(&f_t2a), Some(Ordering::Equal));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// antisymmetry: if a < b then !(a > b), as well as a > b implying !(a < b); and
|
|
|
|
let f_t3b = Filter::Eq(String::from("userid"), String::from(""));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a.partial_cmp(&f_t3b), Some(Ordering::Greater));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t3b.partial_cmp(&f_t1a), Some(Ordering::Less));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// transitivity: a < b and b < c implies a < c. The same must hold for both == and >.
|
|
|
|
let f_t4b = Filter::Sub(String::from("userid"), String::from(""));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a.partial_cmp(&f_t4b), Some(Ordering::Less));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t3b.partial_cmp(&f_t4b), Some(Ordering::Less));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t4b.partial_cmp(&f_t1a), Some(Ordering::Greater));
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t4b.partial_cmp(&f_t3b), Some(Ordering::Greater));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn test_filter_clone() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that cloning filters yields the same result regardless of
|
|
|
|
// complexity.
|
|
|
|
let f_t1a = Filter::Pres(String::from("userid"));
|
|
|
|
let f_t1b = f_t1a.clone();
|
|
|
|
let f_t1c = Filter::Pres(String::from("zzzz"));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a == f_t1b, true);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t1a == f_t1c, false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let f_t2a = Filter::And(vec![f_t1a]);
|
|
|
|
let f_t2b = f_t2a.clone();
|
|
|
|
let f_t2c = Filter::And(vec![f_t1c]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2a == f_t2b, true);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(f_t2a == f_t2c, false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-10-03 13:21:21 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|