mart-w/kanidm
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kanidm/kanidm.git synced 2025-02-23 04:27:02 +01:00
Code Issues Actions 16 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rewrite "choosing a domain", add other considerations (#3147)

Browse source 
Co-authored-by: Firstyear <william@blackhats.net.au>
This commit is contained in:
micolous 2024-10-26 15:31:01 +10:00 committed by GitHub
parent bc55313d87
commit 5c9eb87a75
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 313 additions and 63 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

376
book/src/choosing_a_domain_name.md
View file

@ -1,96 +1,346 @@
# Choosing a Domain Name
Through out this book, Kanidm will make reference to a "domain name". This is your chosen DNS domain
name that you intend to use for Kanidm. Choosing this domain name however is not simple as there are
a number of considerations you need to be careful of.
This book makes many references to a "domain name". This is the DNS domain name
that you intend to use for Kanidm.
This isn't always simple, and this chapter covers the key issues to consider
when choosing a domain.
> [!WARNING]
>
> Incorrect choice of the domain name may have security impacts on your Kanidm instance, not limited
> to credential phishing, theft, session leaks and more. It is critical you follow the advice in
> this chapter.
> **Bad choices** of domain name may have security impacts on your Kanidm
> instance, not limited to credential phishing, theft, session leaks and more.
>
> **Changing** domain name is hard to do – it not only means reconfiguring all
> LDAP and OAuth clients, but will also break all registered WebAuthn
> credentials for all users (which are bound to an `Origin`).
>
> It's critical that you consider and follow the advice in this chapter, and
> aim to get it right the first time.
>
> You'll save yourself a lot of work later!
<!-- -->
> [!TIP]
>
> We believe these practices are applicable *regardless* of your organisation's
> size (even if your Kanidm instance is just for you!), or if you think your
> organisation is not "important enough" to be the target of attacks.
>
> While some suggestions may seem "extreme" or "paranoid", they generally come
> from Kanidm's authors' collective decades of experience managing, maintaining,
> and securing networks and systems at both very large and very small
> organisations both inside and outside the technology industry.
## Considerations
### Domain Ownership
### Use a domain under your exclusive control
It is recommended you use a domain name within a domain that you own. While many examples list
`example.com` throughout this book, it is not recommended to use this outside of testing. Another
example of risky domain to use is `local`. While it seems appealing to use these, because you do not
have unique ownership of these domains, if you move your machine to a foreign network, it is
possible you may leak credentials or other cookies to these domains. TLS in a majority of cases can
and will protect you from such leaks however, but it should not always be relied upon as a sole line
of defence.
You should always use a domain name that you've registered and directly control
its DNS.
Failure to use a unique domain you own, may allow DNS hijacking or other credential leaks in some
circumstances.
While `example.com` and top-level domains ending in `.example` appear throughout
this book, [these are examples only][rfc2606]. You should **not** use this
outside of testing.
### Subdomains
[rfc2606]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2606
Due to how web browsers and webauthn work, any matching domain name or subdomain of an effective
domain may have access to cookies within a browser session. An example is that `host.a.example.com`
has access to cookies from `a.example.com` and `example.com`.
You'll need a registered domain for a CA (certificate authority) to issue you a
TLS certificate which is widely accepted by browsers. This will also **prevent**
those same CAs from issuing a certificate for that domain to *someone else*.
For this reason your Kanidm host (or hosts) should be on a unique subdomain, with no other services
registered under that subdomain. For example, consider `idm.example.com` as a subdomain for
exclusive use of Kanidm. This is _inverse_ to Active Directory which often has its domain name
selected to be the parent (toplevel) domain (`example.com`).
If you use a domain controlled by someone else (eg: a Dynamic DNS provider, or
your cloud provider), they could take over that domain *whenever they like*.
They could also use control of DNS or email to convince a CA to issue a
certificate for that domain.
Failure to use a unique subdomain may allow cookies to leak to other entities within your domain,
and may allow webauthn to be used on entities you did not intend for which may or may not lead to
some phishing scenarios.
*Any party who holds a valid certificate for the domain can steal or issue
credentials.*
## Examples
### Avoid non-public and reserved domains
### Good Domain Names
Avoid using "made-up" (eg: `.lan`) or reserved domains (eg:
[`.local`][dot-local]), because your clients may leak credentials if they move
to another network, aren't connected to a VPN, or if it
[collides with new TLDs][name-collision].
Consider we own `kanidm.com`. If we were to run geographical instances, and have testing
environments the following domain and hostnames could be used.
Properly-configured TLS can prevent *most* (but not all) leakage, but defence in
depth is best.
#### Production Domain Name
This will also ensure your infrastructure is accessible regardless of your
users' local network conditions.
- origin: `https://idm.kanidm.com`
- domain name: `idm.kanidm.com`
- host names: `australia.idm.kanidm.com`, `newzealand.idm.kanidm.com`
[dot-local]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6762.html#section-3
[name-collision]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain#Reserved_domains
This allows us to have named geographical instances such as `https://australia.idm.kanidm.com` which
still works with webauthn and cookies which are transferable between instances.
### Domain authorities
It is critical no other hosts are registered under this domain name.
Domain authorities can set their own eligibility policies for registering a
top-level domain. They may also allow a third-party to challenge your claim to
a top-level domain, subject to a dispute resolution policy. These policies may
change over time for commercial or political reasons.
#### Testing Domain Name
If your domain is on a ccTLD (country TLD), it may be de-registered should that
country cease to exist (eg: [as for `.io`][dot-io]).
- origin: `https://idm.dev.kanidm.com`
- domain name: `idm.dev.kanidm.com`
- host names: `australia.idm.dev.kanidm.com`, `newzealand.idm.dev.kanidm.com`
[dot-io]: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/8/24265441/uk-treaty-end-io-domain-chagos-islands
Note that due to the name being `idm.dev.kanidm.com` vs `idm.kanidm.com`, the testing instance is
not a subdomain of production, meaning the cookies and webauthn tokens can NOT be transferred
between them. This provides proper isolation between the instances.
### Top-level domains containing "kanidm"
### Bad Domain Names
We ask that you **do not** use the word `kanidm` as part of your instance's
*top-level* (or [public suffix][ps]) domain, eg: `contosokanidm.example`.
`idm.local` - This is a bad example as `.local` is an mDNS domain name suffix which means that
client machines if they visit another network _may_ try to contact `idm.local` believing they are on
their usual network. If TLS certificate verification were disabled, this would allow leaking of
credentials.
Use something like `auth`, `idm`, `login` or `sso` instead – they're shorter,
too!
`kanidm.com` - This is bad because the use of the top level domain means that any subdomain can
access the cookies issued by `kanidm.com`, effectively leaking them to all other hosts.
We're OK with you using `kanidm` in a *subdomain* to point to your Kanidm
instance, eg: `kanidm.example.com`.
Second instance overlap:
We've worked hard to build this project, and using its name in conjunction with
an organisation *not* associated with the project dilutes the name's branding
value.
#### Production
### Subdomains and Origin policy
- origin: `https://idm.kanidm.com`
- domain name: `idm.kanidm.com`
Browsers allow a server on a subdomain to use intra-domain resources, and access
and set credentials and cookies from all of its parents until a
[public suffix][ps]. This can allow a malicious or compromised service to attack
other services which share a parent domain.
#### Testing
[ps]: https://publicsuffix.org/
- origin: `https://dev.idm.kanidm.com`
- domain name: `dev.idm.kanidm.com`
Public suffix rules are *mostly* predictable, but has some exceptional cases.
For example:
While the production instance has a valid and well defined subdomain that doesn't conflict, because
the dev instance is a subdomain of production, it allows production cookies to leak to dev. Dev
instances may have weaker security controls in some cases which can then allow compromise of the
production instance.
* `host.a.example.com` can access and set cookies for:
* `host.a.example.com` (itself)
* `a.example.com`
* `example.com`
But **not** the public suffix `.com`.
* `host.a.example.qld.gov.au` can access and set cookies for:
* `host.a.example.qld.gov.au` (itself)
* `a.example.qld.gov.au`
* `example.qld.gov.au`
But **not** any public suffix:
* `qld.gov.au` (Queensland state government)
* `gov.au` (Australian federal government)
* `.au` (Australia)
* `host.a.example.nsw.gov.au` can access and set cookies for:
* `host.a.example.nsw.gov.au` (itself)
* `a.example.nsw.gov.au`
* `example.nsw.gov.au`
* `nsw.gov.au` ([NSW state government has opted out][nsw-optout])
But **not** any public suffix:
* `gov.au` (Australian federal government)
* `.au` (Australia)
[nsw-optout]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547985
This can be an issue if Kanidm shares a domain with:
* applications which serve raw, user-supplied data in APIs (eg: blob/file
storage and [Matrix homeservers][matrix-csp])
* third-party servers *outside* of your organisation's control (eg: SaaS apps)
* anything which can be deployed to with minimal oversight (eg: a web host that
allows uploading content via unencrypted FTP)
[matrix-csp]: https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/blob/develop/README.rst#security-note
### Avoid wildcard and widely-scoped certificates
CAs can issue wildcard TLS certificates, which apply to all subdomains in the
same domain (eg: `*.example.com`).
This is used by some organisations to avoid leaking information about what
services exist on a domain in certificate transparency logs. However, this
information will exposed *anyway* whenever a client makes a DNS query.
If a service is issued a wildcard TLS certificate which *also* covers a Kanidm
installation on the same domain, any DNS hijacking could let that service
impersonate Kanidm to those clients, and steal credentials.
While DNS-over-HTTPS generally prevents local hijacking, it's
[possible for a network to disable it when automatically enabled][disable-doh],
or just block it entirely.
[disable-doh]: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/canary-domain-use-application-dnsnet
Sharing a single certificate between many services increases the risk that the
private key may be exposed, and broadens the impact scope.
### Separate production and testing environments
If running more than one instance of Kanidm, ensure that no two deployments
share the same subdomain. This prevents credential and cookie transfers between
the two environments. For example:
* Production: `idm.example.com`
* Testing: `idm-test.example.com`
If you instead had an instance of Kanidm at `idm.example.com` for production and
another at `test.idm.example.com` for testing, then the test instance could
access the credentials and cookies of the production environment.
This also prevents credentials intended for the test environment from being used
in production (where there may be stricter controls).
### Regional deployments
You could have multiple instances of Kanidm configured with replication, with a
single domain name and origin (eg: `idm.example.com`).
You could then make regional instances accessible from different host names (eg:
`au.idm.example.com` and `nz.idm.example.com`).
This allows credentials and cookies to be freely transferred between hosts that
are part of a single environment.
## Recommendations
For **maximum** security, your Kanidm domain name should be a subdomain of a
top-level domain (or domain under a [public suffix][ps]) that has no other
services assigned it, eg:
* Origin: `https://idm.exampleauth.example`
* Domain name: `idm.exampleauth.example`
When using [OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect](./integrations/oauth2.md), there is no
need for a client app to share a top-level domain with Kanidm, because the app
does not need to share cookies.
Large public auth providers (eg: Google, Meta, Microsoft) work the same way with
both first and third-party apps.
If you have strict security controls for all apps on your top-level domain, you
could run Kanidm on a subdomain of your main domain, eg:
* Origin: `https://idm.example.com`
* Domain name: `idm.example.com`
But running Kanidm on a *separate* top-level domain makes it much easier to
restrict changes that *could* affect your IDM infrastructure.
> [!NOTE]
>
> This is the **inverse** of the common Active Directory practice of using the
> organisation's primary top-level domain directly, eg: `example.com`.
### Multi-environment and regional deployments
If we were to run regional instances, and have a separate testing environment,
the following domain and hostnames could be used:
#### Production environment
- Origin: `https://idm.example.com`
- Domain name: `idm.example.com`
- Host names: `australia.idm.example.com`, `newzealand.idm.example.com`
This allows us to have named regional instances such as
`https://australia.idm.example.com` which still works with WebAuthn and cookies
which are transferable between instances.
It is critical no other hosts are registered under `idm.example.com`.
#### Testing environment
- Origin: `https://idm-test.example.com`
- Domain name: `idm-test.example.com`
- Host names: `australia.idm-test.example.com`, `newzealand.idm-test.example.com`
This puts the testing instance under a separate subdomain of the top-level
domain to production (`idm.example.com`), so cookies and WebAuthn tokens can
**not** be transferred between them.
This provides proper isolation between the instances.
## Bad domain names
Domains you should avoid:
<dl>
<dt>
`idm.local`
</dt>
<dd>
The `.local` top-level domain is [reserved for multicast DNS][dot-local].
If a client visits another network, it _may_ try to contact `idm.local`
believing it is on its usual network. If TLS certificate verification were
disabled (or not configured correctly), this would leak credentials.
</dd>
<dt>
`example.com`
</dt>
<dd>
Using the top-level domain directly allows any subdomain of that domain to
access credentials and cookies intended for Kanidm.
</dd>
<dt>
`idm.example.nsw.gov.au`
</dt>
<dd>
[`nsw.gov.au` has opted out of being a public suffix][nsw-optout], so all
domains under that suffix (except `schools.nsw.gov.au`) share origin and
cookies.
</dd>
<dt>
`idm.examplekanidm.example`
</dt>
<dd>
Kanidm is the brand for this project.
</dd>
</dl>
### Multi-instance with overlap
* Production:
* Origin: `https://idm.example.com`
* Domain name: `idm.example.com`
* Testing:
* Origin: `https://test.idm.example.com`
* Domain name: `test.idm.example.com`
While the production instance has a valid and well defined subdomain that
doesn't conflict, because the testing instance is a subdomain of production, it
allows production cookies to leak to the testing environment.
Testing environments may have weaker security controls in some cases which can
then allow compromise of services using the production instance.