Resolve codespell issues (#1753)

book/src/developers/designs/kanidm-trust.rst

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ There are different ways we can scope a trust out, each with pros-cons. Here are
  is no global catalog, just the details you get in the presented authentication (certificate). You
  may implement some controls around which subject DN's to allow/deny, but this is pretty fraught
  with landminds. You don't know who exists until they login!
-* Azure AD individiual account trusting. Instead of trusting a whole domain you allow a user from
+* Azure AD individual account trusting. Instead of trusting a whole domain you allow a user from
  a remote tennant to access your resources. You don't trust everyone in their tennant, just that
  one account that you can invite. You can then revoke them as needed.
 * Group-trust - FreeIPA does this with AD. It's still like kerberos, but you only trust a subset

book/src/developers/designs/replication.rst

@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ server of the change. A psudeo example of this is:
 Summarised, this shows that on our server, our changelog has changes from A for time range
 T4 to T8, B T6 to T16, and C T0 to T7.
 
-Individiually, a RUV does not allow much, but now we can compare RUVs to another server. Lets
+Individually, a RUV does not allow much, but now we can compare RUVs to another server. Lets
 assume a second server exists with the RUV of:
 
 ::

server/lib/src/idm/credupdatesession.rs

@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ impl<'a> IdmServerProxyWriteTransaction<'a> {
 
         if !eperm_search_primary_cred || !eperm_mod_primary_cred || !eperm_rem_primary_cred {
             security_info!(
-                "Requestor {} does not have permission to update credentials of {}",
+                "Requester {} does not have permission to update credentials of {}",
                 ident,
                 account.spn
             );

server/lib/src/idm/oauth2.rs

@@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ mod tests {
                 == Oauth2Error::InvalidClientId
         );
 
-        //  * mis match origin in the redirect.
+        //  * mismatched origin in the redirect.
         let auth_req = AuthorisationRequest {
             response_type: "code".to_string(),
             client_id: "test_resource_server".to_string(),

server/lib/src/idm/scim.rs

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ impl<'a> IdmServerProxyWriteTransaction<'a> {
 
         if !eperm.delete {
             security_info!(
-                "Requestor {} does not have permission to delete sync account {}",
+                "Requester {} does not have permission to delete sync account {}",
                 sfe.ident,
                 sync_account.name
             );
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ impl<'a> IdmServerProxyWriteTransaction<'a> {
 
         if !eperm.delete {
             security_info!(
-                "Requestor {} does not have permission to delete sync account {}",
+                "Requester {} does not have permission to delete sync account {}",
                 ste.ident,
                 sync_account.name
             );

server/lib/src/server/access/mod.rs

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ pub enum Access {
 
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
 pub struct AccessEffectivePermission {
-    // I don't think we need this? The ident is implied by the requestor.
+    // I don't think we need this? The ident is implied by the requester.
     // ident: Uuid,
     pub target: Uuid,
     pub delete: bool,